Also, acting like shading is the most important thing and is the only thing that matters? I do agree that buildings having proper shading is a key feature and without it buildings look like crap, but I don’t think it is the only thing that should matter in terms of quality. In my opinion the actual texturing of the asset is more important, as a building could be ‘well shaded’ but still look bad if it’s not also well textured. Properly shading a building doesn’t take all that much effort, especially if it’s not well textured, just a pick a darker variant of the same color for the shaded side, or just go over the shaded with translucent black paint, doesn’t take much to achieve. So because it’s not hard to do at all, a bad looking building can still be ‘well shaded’. Good shading and texturing, plus scaling all have to work together for the best looking result, it can’t just be one of these components on its own.The26 wrote: ↑26 Jul 2022, 11:56I don't want to insult you, but honestly, some stuff that gets approved doesn't seem "well shaded", like this image.pngCommanderABab wrote: ↑26 Jul 2022, 09:20Don't expect any more approvals from me this month. (As you don't seem to appreciate simple well shaded and shadowed buildings that I approve.) (They might need details, but they look fine otherwise)
This building doesn't seem to have shadows... image.png
Or this one, which just looks like it's made of cardboard. Has missing shadows, and aren't there any problems with copyright regarding the logo? image.png
Now I know that there's a chance that you weren't the one approving these plugins, but they don't feel like "well shaded and shadowed buildings". These are just a few examples and there are many more plugins, including ones from the same (unmentioned) creators that pretty much don't comply to what you said.
Here’s an example of a ‘well shaded’ but not well textured building: Yes, maybe it’s ‘well shaded’ but is it well textured? Well I don’t know about you but I don’t think so. Those have little effort put into them, just because they’re properly shaded doesn’t exactly make them of “good quality.” In my opinion they’re not plugin store worthy at all, they’re bright, noiseless/textureless, and just look ugly and cartoonish. I don’t think many people would actually want to have their in their cities. After all the plugin store rules say that buildings shouldn’t stand out from the vanilla game and look bright and abstract, and that is exactly what these buildings are. They’d stick out in your city like a sore thumb, they’re absolute eyesores. The plugin store rules also say that plugins shouldn’t look as if they were thrown together in 5 minutes, yet there a many buildings currently on the store that look as if they were, indeed, tossed together in 5 minutes, probably just so the uploader could earn some gems off of them.
An example of a 5 min plugin: No effort at all.