Parks not mandatory to increase happiness

Share your ideas about possible future content here.
User avatar
Newtz
Inhabitant of a Megacity
Reactions:
Posts: 249
Joined: 25 Jul 2018, 15:34
Plugins: Showcase Store
Version: Beta

Platform

Parks not mandatory to increase happiness

#1

Post by Newtz »

But really tho, a park every few tiles isn't really realistic. Pepole irl wouldnt even care if there were 5 parks at their neighborhood

User avatar
_Rock Fort_
Inhabitant of a Country
Reactions:
Posts: 892
Joined: 25 Jun 2018, 15:38
Location: Normandy
Plugins: Showcase Store
Version: Beta

Plugin Creator

Platform

Re: Parks not mandatory to increase happiness

#2

Post by _Rock Fort_ »

That depends . On large cities , with high density and not a lot of gardens its useful for habitants . But in contryside , which a lot of people have there own gardens , i'm more agree , but parks could be helpful to for tourists .

User avatar
cesareborgia94
Reactions:

Re: Parks not mandatory to increase happiness

#3

Post by cesareborgia94 »

Maybe small gardens could add nature influence instead of parks. Or maybe just act as a decor.

Irl it depends, some don't care about parks, some probably due care about parks. Its a matter of utility. If a park provides sightseeing and eyecandy for the public, aka acts to beautify the surroundings, maybe it could make people happier.

It depends on the perspective of different people. I see parks as something to make the surroundings a bit beautiful, aka as an eyecandy or decoration.

User avatar
Newtz
Inhabitant of a Megacity
Reactions:
Posts: 249
Joined: 25 Jul 2018, 15:34
Plugins: Showcase Store
Version: Beta

Platform

Re: Parks not mandatory to increase happiness

#4

Post by Newtz »

I think the parks could be replacements for low nature influence in the city, and "Nature" is the one that is going to increase happiness

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Suggestions”